Christina Goh
Asked 9 years ago

SG chevron_right Primary 5 chevron_right Number and Algebra

Please help!p3math

Replies 3

Tricia Tan

6 years ago
Christina Goh

Tks

6 years ago
Tricia Tan

U welcome

6 years ago
Tricia Tan

U welcome

6 years ago

Alex R. S. Chia
Asked 9 years ago

SG chevron_right Primary 5 chevron_right Number and Algebra

P5 question. Looking for a method that does not use algebra. Answer is $442.

Replies 14

BA Poh Ann

7 watches and 7 bags (7 sets) cost $1547. 1 watch and 1 bag (1 set) = $1547 ÷ 7 = $221 2 watches and 2 bags (2 sets) = $221 x 2 = $442

6 years ago
Sofie Krista

6 years ago
Hwee Koon

Or using simultaneous 12 watches n 20 handbags cost $3660 12 watches n 6 handbags cost $1896 14 handbags cost $3660-1896=1664 I handbags cost 1764/14=126

6 years ago
Shaoyang Brandon

Well, no algebra is needed. Watch the following steps. 3 watches + 5 handbags = $915 4 watches + 2 handbags = $632 SOOOOOO, 7 watches + 7 handbags = $915 + $632 = $1547 7(watch + handbag) = $1547 watch + handbag = $1547 / 7 = $221 2 watches + 2 handbags = 2(watch + handbag) = 2 x $221 = $442 :) No algebra required. Just...observation.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

You are using algebra though. You've used the words 'watches' and 'handbags' instead of variables. You've used the algebraic property of distribution and solved equations as well. All these are algebraic properties. They may be disguised but you are using algebra.

6 years ago
Shaoyang Brandon

So, you mean...algebraic reasoning.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

Yes, that is what I mean. You are using algebraic reasoning.

6 years ago
Vanessa Wong

Actually Shaoyang Brandon did it appropriately by grouping them into groups of 7 with 1 watch and 1 bag in one group. Not so much of simultaneous equations here.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

It's still algebra!

6 years ago
Vanessa Wong

Well, the thing is it is easily understood by a primary school kid. He is not using variable x and y or something abstract.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

I realize that. But the question needs to be carefully crafted to make the numbers work out easily. It is easily accessible to youngsters, but the aim is to start algebraic thought.

6 years ago
Hariani Salleh

This heuristic is called the set method or restating the problem. In fact, if you look at some lower primary questions (which are NO LONGER in syllabus), they use symbolic representation to represent a number. E.g. ♤ + ♡ = 7, ♤ + ♤ = 4...

6 years ago
Monica Toh

Shaoyang Brandon ...U are correct because this is how the primary school teacher teach to get the answer for this type of question.

6 years ago
Alex R. S. Chia

Thank you everyone for the solution as well as the discussion 😄👍🏼

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

You are using algebra though. You've used the words 'watches' and 'handbags' instead of variables. You've used the algebraic property of distribution and solved equations as well. All these are algebraic properties. They may be disguised but you are using algebra.

6 years ago
Shaoyang Brandon

So, you mean...algebraic reasoning.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

Yes, that is what I mean. You are using algebraic reasoning.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

It's still algebra!

6 years ago
Vanessa Wong

Well, the thing is it is easily understood by a primary school kid. He is not using variable x and y or something abstract.

6 years ago
Maggie Lukes

I realize that. But the question needs to be carefully crafted to make the numbers work out easily. It is easily accessible to youngsters, but the aim is to start algebraic thought.

6 years ago

Elvira Ho
Asked 9 years ago

SG chevron_right Primary 6 chevron_right Number and Algebra

Can help?

Replies 1

Shaoyang Brandon

Hi, Elvira Ho. Refer to the image below for the solution to part a and b. For part b, I leave it to you to complete the remaining steps to find the total oranges in the end. You should have an answer between 400 to 500. :)

6 years ago

Adrian Ng
Asked 9 years ago

SG chevron_right Primary 4 chevron_right Number and Algebra

Making it visual...

Replies 0

Sue Koolmom Hana
Asked 9 years ago

SG chevron_right Primary 4 chevron_right Measurement

Hi all, please help with this P4 question..Thanks in advance!

Replies 7

Tricia Tan

Area = length x breadth So, Area of rect / breadth = length Perimeter = 2 x ( length + breadth)

6 years ago
Sue Koolmom Hana

Thanks for your help!😀

6 years ago
Tricia Tan

U welcome.

6 years ago
Yeo Robert

(A) Length = 60.5/9 = 6.7222 meter (B) Perimeter = 2 × (9 + 6.722) = 2 × 15.722 = 31.444 meter = 31.4 m.

6 years ago
Sue Koolmom Hana

Thanks for your help!😀

6 years ago
Yeo Robert

Maybe there is a typo and the area should be 60.3 m2

6 years ago
Sue Koolmom Hana

Yeah, we were confused bout that too...when we initially tried dividing, there seem to be no end to it...😛😛

6 years ago
Sue Koolmom Hana

Yeah, we were confused bout that too...when we initially tried dividing, there seem to be no end to it...😛😛

6 years ago
Sue Koolmom Hana

Thanks for your help!😀

6 years ago
Sue Koolmom Hana

Thanks for your help!😀

6 years ago
Tricia Tan

U welcome.

6 years ago